Vehicle Lemon Law
Attorney in California
Defective vehicle claims under California's Lemon Law. Our experienced attorneys have recovered over $150 million for injured workers and accident victims across California. Free consultation — no fee unless we win.
California Lemon Law: How the Song-Beverly Act Forces Manufacturers to Buy Back Defective Vehicles
California's lemon law — formally the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act — is the most consumer-friendly vehicle warranty law in the United States. The Act requires manufacturers to repurchase, replace, or compensate consumers for defective vehicles when the manufacturer has had a reasonable number of repair attempts but failed to fix the defect. California's manufacturer-paid attorney fee provision under Civil Code § 1794(d) is the most important consumer-protection feature in the statute: when consumers win their lemon law cases, the manufacturer pays the consumer's attorney fees separately, meaning consumers keep 100% of their recovery without any contingency deduction. This fee structure is why most California lemon law cases settle rather than go to trial — manufacturers face escalating attorney fee exposure the longer they fight.
Lemon law applies to new and used vehicles still under the original manufacturer warranty, certified pre-owned vehicles, leased vehicles, electric vehicles, and (in some cases) RVs and motorcycles. The vehicle must have a substantial defect covered by the warranty, the manufacturer must have had reasonable opportunity to repair (typically 2 attempts at the same defect, 4 attempts at any warranty defect, or 30+ days out of service), and the defect must substantially impair the vehicle's use, value, or safety. Common defects driving lemon law claims include transmission failures, engine problems, electrical defects, brake issues, software/infotainment system failures, and (increasingly) EV battery and charging system defects.
Nordanyan Law handles California lemon law cases against every major automotive manufacturer operating in the state — Tesla, Ford, GM, Toyota, Honda, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, VW, Hyundai, Kia, and others. Our process focuses on documenting the repair history, formally presenting the vehicle to the manufacturer, and pursuing the full statutory remedies — repurchase, replacement, or restitution — without taking any contingency from the consumer's recovery.
“Every injured worker deserves the same quality of legal representation as any corporation. That is the principle this firm was built on.”
How We Handle Lemon Law Cases
Lemon law cases are won through documentation. Our process from first consultation through settlement:
No Fee Unless We Win
We work on a contingency fee basis. You pay nothing upfront and nothing unless we win your case. Our success is directly tied to yours.
Cases We Handle in This Area
Repeated transmission slipping, harsh shifting, hesitation, or complete failure. Most common lemon law defect. Settlement typically results in full repurchase with limited usage offset.
Excessive oil consumption, head gasket failures, timing chain stretching, engine knock, or recurrent stalling. Often involves multiple repair attempts before manufacturer acknowledges the defect.
Recurrent battery drain, infotainment system failures, sensor malfunctions, ADAS (advanced driver assistance) system failures. Modern vehicles' electrical complexity creates more lemon law claims than ever.
Brake fade, premature brake wear, steering wander, electric power steering failures. Safety-critical defects that strongly support lemon law claims.
Battery degradation beyond warranty range, charging system failures, motor failures, BMS (battery management system) defects. Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, and other EV manufacturers face increasing lemon law exposure.
Used vehicles still under original manufacturer warranty or CPO warranty. Dealers frequently dispute coverage; we win these cases when the warranty applies to the defect.
Lemon law applies to leased vehicles same as purchased vehicles. Buyback typically includes lease payments made plus deposit refund, minus usage offset.
California Statutes That Apply
California's lemon law requires manufacturers to repurchase, replace, or compensate for vehicles with substantial defects covered by warranty after a reasonable number of repair attempts. Applies to new and used vehicles still under manufacturer warranty.
Reasonable opportunity to repair is generally 2 attempts at the same defect, 4 attempts at any warranty defect, or 30+ days cumulatively out of service. Specific defect categories may have shorter thresholds.
Manufacturers pay the consumer's attorney fees in successful lemon law cases. Consumers keep 100% of their recovery without contingency deduction — the most consumer-friendly fee structure in California law.
Repurchase amount is calculated as full purchase price minus a usage offset based on miles driven before the first repair attempt for the defect. The offset is calculated as (purchase price × miles before first repair) / 120,000.
4 years from when the consumer discovered (or should have discovered) the defect. Practically, claims are filed as soon as the manufacturer has had reasonable repair attempts — don't wait until the warranty expires.
When manufacturer's failure to comply with lemon law is willful, civil penalties up to 2x actual damages may apply. Common when manufacturer knew of widespread defect but refused to repurchase individual vehicles.
Lemon Law Recovery Outcomes
California lemon law provides three remedy paths. Most cases result in repurchase or replacement; restitution applies in specific scenarios:
Full refund of purchase price (or lease payments + deposit) minus usage offset based on miles before first repair attempt. Includes registration, tax, finance charges, and incidental costs. Most cases settle as repurchase.
Manufacturer replaces the defective vehicle with an equivalent vehicle of comparable value. Less common than repurchase because consumers usually prefer the cash refund.
Consumer keeps the vehicle and receives monetary damages for the diminished value. Used when the consumer prefers to keep the vehicle but the manufacturer's offer doesn't reflect true diminished value.
When manufacturer's failure to comply with lemon law was willful. Applies in cases where manufacturer knew of widespread defect, ignored buyback requests, or engaged in pattern of bad faith.
Manufacturer pays consumer's attorney fees separately under § 1794(d) — meaning consumer keeps 100% of recovery. Fee shifting is what drives most cases to settle rather than go to trial.
Out-of-pocket costs related to the defect (rental cars, missed work, towing) are recoverable as incidental damages. Often modest but routinely included in settlement.
Manufacturer Defense Tactics
Vehicle manufacturers and their counsel run specific defense patterns in lemon law cases:
Substantial impairment is a low bar — most repeating defects qualify. Document the specific functional impacts (acceleration failures, electrical issues affecting safety features, etc.) and the consumer's reasonable concerns about reliability.
Reasonable opportunity is generally 2 attempts at the same defect OR 4 attempts at any warranty defect OR 30+ days out of service. Manufacturers often understate this threshold; we document repair history showing the standard was met.
Usage offset under § 1793.2(d)(2)(C) is specifically calculated. Manufacturers often inflate usage to reduce buyback amount. We calculate the correct offset and refuse settlements that exceed it.
Incidental damages (rental cars, towing, alternative transportation) are recoverable under California Commercial Code. We document and include them in every settlement.
Many manufacturer arbitration programs are inadequate. Most lemon law cases proceed in superior court under § 1794 jurisdiction. We avoid manufacturer arbitration when better venues are available.
Manufacturer-paid attorney fees under § 1794(d) create exposure that grows with delay. We use this fee structure to our advantage — long cases produce larger total settlements because manufacturer-paid fees compound.
Cases We Have Won
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies as a lemon under California law?+
What can I get from a Lemon Law claim?+
Can I file Lemon Law for a used car?+
How long do I have to file a Lemon Law claim?+
What does it cost to hire a Lemon Law attorney?+
Related Practice Areas
What Our Clients Say
I had a very positive experience working with Minas Nordanyan and his team on my workers' compensation case. Minas was knowledgeable and guided me through a process that was not easy. His staff was incredibly helpful — especially Crystal and Mayra, who were always responsive and patient, and took the time to answer my questions and follow up when needed. They made a stressful situation much easier to navigate. I'm very grateful for their support and pleased with the outcome of my case. I highly recommend this firm.
Thank you so much — you are the best. I appreciate the time Mr. Rubin Resnick spent explaining the process on my case and how everything works. You are clearly very knowledgeable and you genuinely care for your clients. You treated me with respect. I have to say you are one of the best lawyers in Los Angeles and Burbank. I will highly recommend you to anyone who needs a professional lawyer. Thank you again for taking the time to talk to me about everything.
From the first consultation to today, I very much appreciate the patience and time this team has dedicated to my case. They helped open my eyes to the workers' comp process and guided me through. Big thumbs up to the team — to Minas, Katy, Rubin, and Harry. Thank you. Thanks to Juan, Angela, Paulina, and Crystal as well.
Need a Vehicle Lemon Law Attorney?
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. Call now.
Call (818) 525-1700